The seemingly strange decision by the judge in the SCO vs. IBM case is — as usual — explained by Groklaw. The judge's role is not to clarify who is right — that's a different judge's job. Her job is only to ensure that all parties put all relevant material on the table. So it's solely about the investigation documents. Still, this is of course the annoying delay tactic by SCO at work. But it's not the big interim victory for SCO as one might possibly see it.