ITU plans to combat cybercrime face resistance - why we definitely do not want any involvement of the ITU in any form. This is the typical megalomania of the old monopolists in the telecommunications industry and their state lackeys. Does anyone believe there would still be chances for independent projects if the ITU were to actually succeed with its idea of mandating the implementation of ITU security protocols? Especially since ITU standards are anything but free (and even patent-infested garbage can establish itself there as a "standard" that can then only be implemented in practice by stores like IBM or similar. The IETF is a chaotic bunch - but due to the quite pragmatic structure ("a standard can become what two interoperable, independent implementations can demonstrate") is much better suited for the Internet and its constantly changing situation.