When you look around at phone tariffs, you can indeed get minor to major fits of rage. The telephony components are now somewhat okay, the SMS rates are still ridiculous to absurd - there are no more expensive ways to send your data in 140-character packages. But okay, that's nothing new. But when you look at the data rates, you really start screaming.
The reason why I subjected myself to this madness: SMS from T-Mobile that I had used up my full-speed volume and now for the rest of the month I have to live with 64kbit downstream and 16kbit upstream. Checked in my iPhone under data usage: 1.1G downstream and 430 MB upstream. Unfortunately, but in a period of almost one year. How I suddenly should have used 200 MB in the first 8 days of this month was a mystery to me until I remembered that the providers conveniently bill started 100kbit chunks. So that the full-speed volume is used up as quickly as possible. Thanks, push notifications.
Looking at the three big ones (T-Mobile, Vodafone, and O2), you first see nice overviews with prices. And of course flat. Today everything is flat. But flat was probably only the mind of the marketing guy who came up with this nonsense. Although the volume is actually unlimited, but of course only in the fine print it says from which volume you are reduced to ridiculous 64kbit - and that is only the download, the upload is then reduced to 16kbit, almost unusable.
To O2's credit: if you click on the right paths, you get a relatively clear view of the throttling stage there. So not under the mobile tariffs with the smartphone specification, but via the internet and then surfing with a mobile phone. Why one is clear and the other is not, only the web designers know. Or the price hiders. Possibly, the other providers also have an emergency page where you get a reasonable overview, but at some point, I didn't feel like looking anymore.
The fine print is incidentally only with the Telekom referenced with numbers in the tariff - and already displayed unfolded at the bottom. With O2 and Vodafone, you first have to think that something could be hidden under "further legal notices" or "further notes," without being pointed out. Why bother, it's insignificant, it's all flat. Oh, and of course pale-gray font and only 10 points high, it shouldn't be too easy to read. For me, this borders on fraud.
Apart from the hidden placement: the normally affordable tariffs (sorry, but tariffs over 50 euros a month are simply an audacity but not an offer) have ridiculous 300 MB volume until the shutdown. Oh, sorry, Vodafone only has 200 MB ...
Then there are the funny ideas about contract bindings. Yes, I can understand the 2-year binding if you take a contract with a device - after all, the device has to be financed over it and I don't expect gifts. But the then casual extension by one year if you don't cancel at least 3 months before the end of the forced period, that is really cheeky.
Especially when you look at the budget brands of the big providers: Base, Fonic, Congstar. Strangely enough, you can see directly on the tariff overview which variants of throttling there are. In addition, there are several variants. And there are significantly clearer prices. Only strange - they run over the networks of the mothers. I don't have to mention that the budget brands have more moderate contract bindings, do I? Of course, the budget brands are not good either - there is not even the claim anymore that you would get service (which the big ones don't really deliver either - those are rather acts of desperation than service).
It's strange that the same service can be offered at drastically different prices, and the budget brand still makes a profit. Could this have something to do with the fact that the mother brand simply sells things at moon prices? Oh, and it is of course pure coincidence that they all have almost the same prices in their respective segments. I mean, this is a well-regulated market, there are certainly no agreements or anything like that. How can one even think of that ...
The enemy of mobile internet, the stumbling block of the development of this sector? The absurd ideas of mobile phone providers. It's time for alternative radio technologies that can be provided by providers outside this inbred bunch of purse snatchers. But hoping for that is probably also absurd, the telecommunications lobby will take care that the market is not accidentally opened.
PS: yes, I know that Base is not Vodafone's budget brand but E+'s. Or uses the E+ network. Does Vodafone even have something like a budget brand?
Map Tunneling Tool. Cool - you can enter your location on a map and it will show you the antipodal point on the other side of the Earth. We are pretty much in the South Pacific, southeast of New Zealand. Spain has it good, they come out directly in New Zealand.
Sankra Software: Disable OS X Lion Resume per application. Since Apple implemented this feature a bit "aggressively" (it is also activated for apps that do not explicitly say "turn this on, I can handle it"), it can sometimes be quite annoying - some apps then perform both their own "new program start" action and then the system's action afterwards - for example, some editors open two windows on the same file if both the editor and the OSX say "Restore Window". Therefore, it is not impractical to be able to disable this feature per application. Although, of course, this will be forgotten at the latest when the application is updated, and you wonder why the windows no longer open automatically because the application has switched from its own control to system control. But hey, software is the last remaining adventure ...
Modula-3 Resource Page. Continuing with niche languages - Modula-3 has always fascinated me because it was a pragmatic and practical extension of the Wirthian language world and at the same time integrated a lot of interesting language constructs into a familiar imperative language system. And development continues to this day, the download even has binary packages for Darwin (the Unix foundation of OSX), although currently only 32bit (and I guess no bridge to Objective-C and thus to the Cocoa APIs).
Magpie Guide: Welcome. Since we're on the topic of niche languages: Magpie is yet another language for the JVM. This one looks a bit like a mix of Scala and Ruby, but the concepts are quite different. Particularly nice is multidispatch - generic functions that choose the appropriate version based on all their parameters and their types. Reminds me a bit of CLOS in that aspect. Additionally, there are full closures and functions, and blocks are first-class objects in the system. Additionally, there is an approach to metaprogramming with quotations, although I still consider the Lisp approach unbeaten (simply because in Lisp the structures of the parse tree correspond 1:1 to the actual syntax and the lists as internal representation, while in languages with Algol-like syntax the whole thing is much more indirect). What I personally also find pleasant: Magpie is very text-oriented, not so heavily reliant on special characters. It reads more pleasantly to me.